<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Linux-Kernel on Donia Chaiehloudj</title><link>https://www.doniacld.com/tags/linux-kernel/</link><description>Recent content in Linux-Kernel on Donia Chaiehloudj</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><copyright>Donia Chaiehloudj</copyright><lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://www.doniacld.com/tags/linux-kernel/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Is XDP more performant than TC?</title><link>https://www.doniacld.com/blog/is-xdp-more-performant-than-tc/</link><pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://www.doniacld.com/blog/is-xdp-more-performant-than-tc/</guid><description>I wrote the same packet drop two ways, in TC and in XDP, and measured the CPU. On veth, XDP was 1.7% slower. On a real driver it cut cycles by 28%. Where XDP runs decides what it saves.</description></item></channel></rss>